Know what applies. Prove you complied.

Enter your website. See what a regulator, a customer or a procurement desk can already see — read against the law where you operate, in the EU, the UK or the US — then keep the dated, hashed record that proves you fixed it.

Free · one page · deterministic checks, no AI grading your site

/scan

Read against European Union law

Coverage: verified · engine 2026-08-28

Needs attention

No privacy policy link found

GDPR · Articles 13–14

Review

Chat widget with no disclosure wording found

EU AI Act · Article 50(1)

Needs attention

Tracking scripts with no consent tool found

ePrivacy Directive · art. 5(3)

What this is

Most small firms will never hire a compliance officer.

So the work either doesn’t happen or it lands on the founder at eleven at night. Kritia does the part a person would do on a laptop: works out which duties reach a company your size in the country you trade from, checks what your own website is already showing the world, and keeps the dated, fingerprinted file that proves what you did and when.

Use the AI tools confidently. This is the paperwork behind them — the thing a serious business simply has, like a spam filter or a certificate.

Exact, not approximate

Article numbers, dates and citations, produced by fixed rules. No language model writes an obligation or a policy clause here — a fresh paraphrase every run is not something a solicitor can sign off once and stand behind.

Records, not reassurance

Every document Kritia issues carries a SHA-256 fingerprint and a timestamp in an append-only log. When a customer asks what you assessed and when, that is the answer — not a memory of a good intention.

No fear marketing

Fine figures are shown at the SME cap Article 99(6) actually sets, never the €15M headline. Where a rule is mapped from primary sources but not yet human-verified, the page says so and quotes no figure at all.

What is encoded today: the EU AI Act, to the article, as amended by the July 2026 Digital Omnibus. Around it the website scan reads a wider set — GDPR, ePrivacy and the Accessibility Act in the EU, UK GDPR and PECR in Britain, CalOPPA, the FTC Act and state opt-out duties in the United States — and reports them as signals to act on, never as a verdict. GDPR is the next regime to be encoded in full.

The numbers

What this is built on

Every figure below is either read straight out of the shipped code or carries its source. None of them are adoption numbers — this is what the engine tracks, who the law reaches, and what the alternatives cost. If a number here cannot be traced to what produced it, it does not belong on a page selling proof.

Coverage

What the engine actually tracks

Counted from the code at build time, so the page cannot drift from the product. Risk classes and obligation text come from fixed rules — never from a language model. Where a market is labelled mapped rather than verified, a person has not yet re-checked it against the primary texts, and it carries no penalty figures anywhere in the product.

3
markets your findings are read against, chosen when you scan
1 verified · 2 mapped from primary sources
22
duties mapped across those markets — GDPR, ePrivacy, the AI Act, PECR, CalOPPA, the FTC Act and the rest, each named with its article
lib/jurisdictions.ts
27
member states mapped, each with its own supervising authority
lib/countries.ts
11
national implementing statutes in force, cited by name on your policy
5 more designated without a statute · 11 pending
3
statutory deadlines counted down from today, not from a blog post
2 Dec 2026 · 2 Dec 2027 · 2 Aug 2028
SHA-256
fingerprint on every issued document, so you can prove it never changed
Append-only evidence log

Reach

Who the law applies to

The Act is a Regulation: it applies directly and identically in every member state, which is why the EU is where Kritia encodes first — it is the only one of our three markets with a statutory clock. Most of the businesses inside its scope have never been told they are.

~25M
EU SMEs the Act can reach
Eurostat structural business statistics
1.5–2.5M
already in Article 50 scope — a chatbot or published AI content is enough
Derived from Eurostat AI adoption rates
<20%
of SME AI users have heard of the AI Act at all
Themio SME Digital Compliance Barometer 2026
248,344
Irish SMEs — 99.8% of every enterprise in the country
Central Statistics Office

Cost

What the alternatives charge

Nothing here is a knock on solicitors — a solicitor is the right call for a hard question. This is what maintaining an ordinary evidence file costs when you buy it by the hour, or by the enterprise seat. The gap in the middle is the whole business: officer-grade records at a subscription price you can read before you talk to anyone.

€250–450
per hour for a Dublin solicitor
Irish legal rate guides 2026
€5,000–25,000
for a one-off SME AI Act readiness project, then 20–40% annually
Consultancy estimates
€1,000–5,000
per month for an enterprise governance platform, quoted on request after a sales call
Published vendor pricing
€20–30
per month here — less than one hour of solicitor time per year
Flat. Scope check, scanner and policy generator stay free

9 plain-English guides cover the EU AI Act side of this in depth, free and without an account: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. The duties from the other regimes are cited article by article inside the report itself rather than written up as guides. If you find a figure on this page you cannot trace to its source, that is a bug worth telling us about.

What the file is for

The questionnaire usually arrives before the regulator does.

For most small firms the first real test is not an inspection. It is a tender pack, an insurer, or an enterprise buyer’s vendor questionnaire asking which AI tools you use, who classified them, and what you tell your customers about them.

Answering that from scratch costs days and reads like an improvisation. Answering it from a maintained record costs an afternoon and reads like a company that has its house in order. The regulator is the reason the duties exist. The customer asking is what makes the file pay for itself.

Pricing

Two plans, one product, and the price is on the page.

Every feature is in both plans — nothing is held back on the cheaper one. The only thing you are choosing between is how many questions you can put to Kritia in a month. The scope check, the website scan and the policy generator stay free, with no account.

Kritia Core

€20 / month

The whole product: analyses, scans, and the evidence file itself.

  • Guided analyses — campaigns, website, new AI tools
  • AI inventory with deterministic risk classification
  • Append-only evidence log — hashed, timestamped
  • Website scans, scope checks, policy generator, integrations
  • 60 questions to Ask Kritia each month

Kritia Plus

€30 / month

The same product, with room to ask a great deal more.

  • Everything in Core — no feature is held back
  • 200 questions to Ask Kritia each month
  • For teams leaning on the assistant weekly, not monthly
Start free for 7 days

No card. The trial does not convert on its own — it ends, and you decide. Cancel or change plan from the billing page at any time.